Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Related%20passage for Yevamot 120:20

תניא וכן היה ר"ש בן יוחאי אומר

will be with him,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The union is consequently allowed to remain. ');"><sup>46</sup></span> and she would also ultimately become a be'ulah while with him;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The union is consequently allowed to remain. ');"><sup>46</sup></span> but here, would she ultimately become a harlot<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which is the prohibition under which a priest may not marry the proselyte mentioned. ');"><sup>47</sup></span> while with him?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Obviously not. Hence, it may well be concluded that were she not allowed to marry a priest, the union would have had to be dissolved even after marriage had taken place. ');"><sup>48</sup></span> R. Safra taught [that he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Jacob b. Idi. ');"><sup>40</sup></span> arrived at it]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 403. n. 13. ');"><sup>42</sup></span> by deduction, and, having raised the difficulty,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Mentioned supra. that an ex post facto may be different. ');"><sup>49</sup></span> answered it in the same way.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Had it not been permitted originally the marriage would have had to be annulled even ex post facto. ');"><sup>50</sup></span> A certain priest married a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day. Said R. Nahman b. Isaac to him: What [do you mean by] this?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., on what authority did you contract the marriage. ');"><sup>51</sup></span> — The other replied: Because R. Jacob b. Idi stated in the name of R. Joshua b. Levi that the <i>halachah</i> is in agreement with R. Simeon b. Yohai.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 403. n. 13. ');"><sup>52</sup></span> 'Go', the first said, 'and arrange for her release, or else I will pull R. Jacob b. Idi out of your ear'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' He would place him under the ban and thus compel him to carry out his decision which is contrary to that of R. Jacob b. Idi. ');"><sup>53</sup></span> It was taught: And so did R. Simeon b. Yohai state

Explore related%20passage for Yevamot 120:20. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse